**Discussion Closed** This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

## "Failed to find consistent initial values"

Posted 12 dec. 2014 12:43 GMT-05:00 Fluid Version 5.0 23 Replies

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Again, the most basic form of the problem is 2D incompressible flow on a fully periodic domain, failing with a uniform flow initial value.

Thanks.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Genuinely seeking to understand and find possible ways around these issues.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I can now confirm that the problem is version related, having tested on two independent machines, one windows 64 bit, the other linux 32 bit. All periodic flow problems I tried succeed for version 4.3a and fail for 4.3b and 4.4. Unfortunately I cannot test version 5 due to license constraints.

In absence of anything resembling a bug tracking system I will document my findings here hoping that somebody will pick it up. Meanwhile I will instruct my students to downgrade their systems.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE

- In model wizard select 2D, Laminar flow, Time dependent.

- Under Geometry add a 1x1 square.

- Under Laminar flow select incompressible, and set Fluid properties to rho=1, mu=1.

- Add a periodic flow condition on boundary 1 and 4, and another on 2 and 3.

- Set initial conditions u=1, v=0, p=0.

Leave the rest at default. Computation succeeds for Comsol 4.3a, but fails for 4.3b and 4.4 indicating "Failed to find consistent initial values".

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

--

Steven Conrad, MD PhD

LSU Health

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I believe the problem is that there is no unique value for the pressure. If you set a Pressure Point Constraint to zero at any point it works.

Nagi Elabbasi

Veryst Engineering

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Try setting the initial time step to something small. This can be found under Time-Dependent Solver > Initial Step and check the box and specify an initial time step.

Hi Edwin, thanks for the advice. Unfortunately the error did not go away with an initial step as low as 1e-10. Could you perhaps explain the rationale behind this suggestion?

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Post or send a copy of your model, and I will look at it. I have 4.4 and 5.0 installed.

Hi Steve, thanks for the offer. Please find attached a model file corresponding to "steps to reproduce".

Attachments:

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I believe the problem is that there is no unique value for the pressure. If you set a Pressure Point Constraint to zero at any point it works.

Hi Nagi, the pressure singularity should be an issue for stationary problems only; for time dependent problems the pressure is constrained at t=0 by the initial condition.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Not if you have an incompressible fluid formulation. A uniform increase in pressure at any time is still a solution even in the time dependent problem.

Nagi Elabbasi

Veryst Engineering

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Not if you have an incompressible fluid formulation. A uniform increase in pressure at any time is still a solution even in the time dependent problem.

Well that's embarrassing. I humbly stand corrected, and thank you very much for pointing this out. The reason I got away with the setup earlier was the use of a Krylov solver, but indeed the systems were always singular. Mystery solved. Thanks to all who offered to help out!

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello,

I got a quite similar problem. Could you explain better how do you solve it?

How did you change the setting in the solver?

Thanks!

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Nagi's post of 12/22/14 gives the solution: you don't change any setting on the solver, but rather you constrain the pressure at some point to eliminate the singularity.

Jeff

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

How to do that?

perhaps by mean a pointwise constraint?

Thanks!

Andrea

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Jeff

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I'm solving the problem with the PDE coefficient form toolbox, so I don't think that there is a possibility to set a pressure constraint...

Again, do I have to do that with a pointwise constraint or something? How ca I do with PDE Coefficient for tool?

Thanks.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Jeff

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Let me explain better, maybe I have been a bit hermetic.

I'm trying to solve a coupled problem in which the two set of equation are:

-The navier stokes equation in which the forcing terms is coupled with another field that has another own (2nd) equation. Finally there is the incompressibility constraint (div(v)=0)

The geometry is a circle domain with dirichlet boundary condition on v and Neumann boundary condition for the other field.

I followed the following procedures:

1I Wrote the equation in the PDE coefficient form in which also the hydrostatic pressure is a dependent variable. The equation for it in the coefficient form will be everything equal to zero a part of the forcing term equal to the divergence of v.

I tried to solve the problem with the initial condition (compatible with the boundary condition) exactly equal to the solution that I had in the time independent solver.

2.Write the equation in the coefficient form in which the hydrostatic pressure is taken into account as a Lagrangian multiplier with a weak constraint on the divergence of v and repeat the same strategy with the initial condition.

In both case the code find a correct let me say "static" solution but has a problem at the initial time step

("Failed to find consistent initial values") with the time dependent solver.

3. Same strategy but pointwise constraint, the code doesn't find a solution in a reasonable time.

I can't attach the code...

Thank you in advance.

Andrea

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Note that you can clear all solutions from your .mph files (By using the button on the Study ribbon) to make them small enough to post here.

Best,

Jeff

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I am facing a same issue .

"Failed to find consistent initial values.

Segregated group 1

System matrix is zero.

Last time step is not converged."

I am trying to apply a series of voltage values on certain time steps .But i am stuck at this error.

Alas, without knowing what equations you are solving and precisely how you are implementing them in COMSOL, users of this Forum cannot offer much useful help - at best you'll get wild guesses that may send you in the wrong direction.

Note that you can clear all solutions from your .mph files (By using the button on the Study ribbon) to make them small enough to post here.

Best,

Jeff

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Thanks for replying...

Let me explain better, maybe I have been a bit hermetic.

I'm trying to solve a coupled problem in which the two set of equation are:

-The navier stokes equation in which the forcing terms is coupled with another field that has another own (2nd) equation. Finally there is the incompressibility constraint (div(v)=0)

The geometry is a circle domain with dirichlet boundary condition on v and Neumann boundary condition for the other field.

I followed the following procedures:

1I Wrote the equation in the PDE coefficient form in which also the hydrostatic pressure is a dependent variable. The equation for it in the coefficient form will be everything equal to zero a part of the forcing term equal to the divergence of v.

I tried to solve the problem with the initial condition (compatible with the boundary condition) exactly equal to the solution that I had in the time independent solver.

2.Write the equation in the coefficient form in which the hydrostatic pressure is taken into account as a Lagrangian multiplier with a weak constraint on the divergence of v and repeat the same strategy with the initial condition.

In both case the code find a correct let me say "static" solution but has a problem at the initial time step

("Failed to find consistent initial values") with the time dependent solver.

3. Same strategy but pointwise constraint, the code doesn't find a solution in a reasonable time.

I can't attach the code...

Thank you in advance.

Andrea

Hi Andrea,

I have met a similar notification telling that "Failed to find consistent initial values" with PDE equations;

Have you solved it ? and could you please give me a hint?

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Bill

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Not if you have an incompressible fluid formulation. A uniform increase in pressure at any time is still a solution even in the time dependent problem.

Well that's embarrassing. I humbly stand corrected, and thank you very much for pointing this out. The reason I got away with the setup earlier was the use of a Krylov solver, but indeed the systems were always singular. Mystery solved. Thanks to all who offered to help out!

Dear Gertjan,

I added a pressure point constraint in your model, there is no error occuring, but without any solutions.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,

Bill

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL^{®} software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

## Suggested Content

- FORUM Failed to find consistent initial values. Last time step is not converged.
- BLOG Verify Simulations with the Method of Manufactured Solutions
- FORUM 3D FSI Failed to find consistent initial values
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Solving time dependent CFD simulations
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Wrong number of DOFs in initial value