Hyperelastic Seal with holes

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I want to use the Hyperelastic Seal model (https://www.comsol.com/model/hyperelastic-seal-206) with small hole added. In this way, the confined air can escape from the hole during seal compression.

Can I simply modify the existing model or need a fully coupled FSI?

Thank you.


3 Replies Last Post Feb 6, 2024, 2:49 a.m. EST
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 months ago Feb 1, 2024, 4:13 a.m. EST

I studied a similar problem about 25 years ago. It is a very interesting problem, because the apparent seal stiffness (and damping) becomes strongly dependent on the compression speed. By selecting an appropriate size and spacing of the evacuation holes, you can tune the dynamic properties of the seal.

An approach that worked well (experimentally verified) was to not model the evacuation hole, but just solve an extra equation.

The assumtion is then that the evacuation flow velocity is controlled by the difference between the current pressure inside the seal and the external pressure. When the evacuation mass flow is thus known, the rate of pressure reduction inside the seal can be computed.

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
I studied a similar problem about 25 years ago. It is a very interesting problem, because the apparent seal stiffness (and damping) becomes strongly dependent on the compression speed. By selecting an appropriate size and spacing of the evacuation holes, you can tune the dynamic properties of the seal. An approach that worked well (experimentally verified) was to not model the evacuation hole, but just solve an extra equation. The assumtion is then that the evacuation flow velocity is controlled by the difference between the current pressure inside the seal and the external pressure. When the evacuation mass flow is thus known, the rate of pressure reduction inside the seal can be computed.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 months ago Feb 5, 2024, 2:52 a.m. EST
Updated: 3 months ago Feb 5, 2024, 2:52 a.m. EST

Thank you, Henrik. You suggestion is super helpful.

To follow your suggested approach, I think I should use the boundary load node instead of the new Enclosed Cavity node released in the latest version 6.2. The "old" approach allows us to define the load freely.

Is using Global Equations (ODE) node a suitable way to compute the pressure reduction rate?

Thank you, Henrik. You suggestion is super helpful. To follow your suggested approach, I think I should use the boundary load node instead of the new Enclosed Cavity node released in the latest version 6.2. The "old" approach allows us to define the load freely. Is using Global Equations (ODE) node a suitable way to compute the pressure reduction rate?

Aaron Dettmann COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 months ago Feb 6, 2024, 2:49 a.m. EST
Updated: 3 months ago Feb 6, 2024, 3:38 a.m. EST

It should still be possible (and easier) to use the Enclosed Cavity node in your case. Assuming that you have formulated your equation of state, which takes the mass flow rate into account, you can enter the pressure load either using the Fluid subnode with Compressibility set to User defined, or using the Prescribed Pressure subnode. The latter subnode is equivalent to using a Boundary Load with the Pressure option. The big advantage of using Enclosed Cavity is that you get direct access to variables for the deformed and undeformed volume (or area), and you can use these variables when defining your equation of state.

The Global Equations node is suitable for solving for any additional global unknowns, for instance an unknown mass flow rate.

It should still be possible (and easier) to use the Enclosed Cavity node in your case. Assuming that you have formulated your equation of state, which takes the mass flow rate into account, you can enter the pressure load either using the **Fluid** subnode with Compressibility set to User defined, or using the **Prescribed Pressure** subnode. The latter subnode is equivalent to using a Boundary Load with the Pressure option. The big advantage of using Enclosed Cavity is that you get direct access to variables for the deformed and undeformed volume (or area), and you can use these variables when defining your equation of state. The Global Equations node is suitable for solving for any additional global unknowns, for instance an unknown mass flow rate.

Reply

Please read the discussion forum rules before posting.

Please log in to post a reply.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.