Computing Porosity and Permeability in Porous Media with a Submodel

Andrew Young September 27, 2017
Share this on Facebook Share this on Twitter Share this on LinkedIn

When simulating flow in porous media, it can be efficient to simplify the geometric complexity of the real porous material using a homogenized macroscale approach. But what if we don’t know what the effective macroscopic properties are? Here, we look at how to extract the macroscopic flow properties of porosity and permeability from a fully resolved microscale submodel.

Using a Macroscale Approach to Model Porous Media Flow

In a previous blog post, we discuss interfaces available for simulating macroscale flow in porous media, including the Darcy’s Law interface. Solving for Darcy’s law can provide insight into many different physical systems where it is practically impossible to simulate the fully resolved microscale system. This difficulty is due to the large difference between the length scales of the microscopic and macroscopic systems found in application areas such as oil and gas, civil engineering, and biological and medical engineering.

A photo of a sponge, which is a porous material.
A sponge is one example of a porous material.

The macroscale approach assumes that the behavior of the pore space is quantified by two averaged quantities:

  1. Permeability
  2. Porosity

Permeability characterizes the resistance to flow through the pores. Porosity, which is defined as the volume fraction of the pore space, determines the superficial average velocity. As for the superficial velocity, it is the equivalent velocity through the homogenized domain — as if the microscopic flow through the pore space were distributed evenly at the macroscopic scale.

If the porosity and permeability are not known, experimental results are necessary to quantify these material properties. Numerical experiments via simulation can also be used to analyze the fully resolved geometry, which includes voids and solid particles. By solving the Navier-Stokes equations (or its linear approximation for small Reynolds numbers, called Stokes flow or creeping flow) on the microscale geometry, the porosity and permeability of the porous medium can be extracted.

Creating a Microscale Porous Geometry

Before we investigate the porosity and permeability of a porous medium, we must discuss the generation of the microscale geometry. This is not necessarily a simple process! Creating such a geometry often requires specialized third-party software (like Simpleware or Mimics®) to reconstruct scanned image data, particularly for complex 3D geometries. Here, we focus on a 2D cross section, such as one generated from a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image.

The Pore-Scale Flow tutorial model is created from an image file that is directly imported into the COMSOL Multiphysics® software as a function. The geometry is reconstructed from this function by using methods similar to those discussed in the following blog posts:

For geometries that are too complex or contain restrictively small features that impact the mesh resolution, you can use the approach adopted in the pore-scale flow tutorial, which will be discussed in an upcoming blog post.

Using the Creeping Flow Interface in COMSOL Multiphysics®

Let’s now take a quick look at the pore-scale flow example, which solves the fully resolved pore space geometry. We can use the postprocessing tools within COMSOL Multiphysics to extract the porosity and compute the permeability by using Darcy’s law.

The dimensions of the whole geometry are 640 × 320 μm (and the channel width in the pore spaces is even narrower), so we know the characteristic length scale, L, is small. Further, as we are considering a slow flow driven by a pressure gradient of 2 Pa, we also know that the typical velocity, U, is low. Therefore, given a water-like fluid with a density of ρ = 1000 kg/m3 and viscosity of μ = 0.001 Pa*s, we can safely neglect the inertial term of the Navier-Stokes equations and solve using the Creeping Flow interface. We can use this interface because the Reynolds number, Re, is significantly less than 1.

Get more information in this blog post: Characterizing the Flow and Choosing the Right Interface

The pressure drop is applied from right to left using Inlet and Outlet conditions. As this model is a representative cross section of the porous medium that we wish to characterize, a Symmetry condition is prescribed along the boundaries caused by the truncation of the geometry at the top and bottom. These boundaries are indicated in the left figure below. The image on the right shows the results, visualized using a velocity magnitude color plot with arrow vectors of the flow direction.

A fully resolved microscale model that was solved with the Creeping Flow interface in COMSOL Multiphysics.
Image depicting a velocity magnitude simulation plot showing flow through a pore space.

Left: Geometry and boundary conditions of the fully resolved microscale model solved with the Creeping Flow interface. Right: Velocity magnitude color plot with a red arrow plot representing the orientation of the flow through the pore space.

Computing the Porosity and Permeability of the Porous Medium

Calculating Porosity

We first compute the porosity, por. In this 2D example, we need to calculate both the total area and the area represented by our computational domain.

We can compute the total area simply as a variable: A_tot = L*H. To determine the area of the pore space, A_por, we can integrate the expression “(1)” over the flow domain. This can be easily achieved by using an integration component coupling, a custom operator that can integrate any expression over domains, boundaries, and more. The settings used for the computation of A_tot, A_por, and por are shown in the image below.

Screenshot showing the variables used to calculate porosity and permeability in COMSOL Multiphysics.
Definitions of variables used in computing the porosity and permeability.

Calculating Permeability

The image above also shows how the permeability, k0, is computed. Darcy’s law states:

\mathbf{u} = -\frac{\kappa}{\mu} \nabla p

where u is the Darcy or superficial velocity, κ is the permeability, μ is the dynamic viscosity, and ∇p is the pressure gradient.

The Darcy velocity can be computed with some help from the predefined variables within the Creeping Flow interface.

The variable spf.out1.Mflow defines the mass flow through the outlet boundary, where we can divide by the constant density, ρ0, to obtain the volumetric flow rate. This can then be divided by the height of the porous medium and again by 1 m, to account for the 2D approximation and obtain the Darcy velocity in the x direction.

By rearranging (1) and substituting \nabla p = \frac{\Delta p}{L}, we can use the known pressure drop, p0, across the length of the porous region, L, to evaluate the permeability to the variable k0.

The results show us that this microscale representation of the porous medium has a porosity of 0.553 and a permeability of 4.59 × 10-12 m2.

Screen capture highlighting simulation results from using a flow submodel to compute porosity and permeability.
Results table for the computed porosity and permeability from the fully resolved flow submodel.

Concluding Thoughts on Computing Porosity and Permeability

In this blog post, we discussed how we can use simulation to derive the macroscale properties of flow through porous media — solving a free flow problem on a fully resolved microscale submodel. Equipped with this information, we can use these parameters as input for a more descriptive macroscale model. Better still, this approach is the ideal way to know what input to use in a user-friendly app, such as in this example app that considers the productivity and safety of a perforated well.

Additional Resources


Categories


Comments

  1. Yu Zhang August 17, 2018   4:10 pm

    Hi, Andrew Young:

    Thank you for sharing us this useful technique. I encountered a convergence issue caused by the extremely small permeability which can reach 1e-21[m^2]. I have tried many ways, but it is still there. Do you have any experiences about how to solve it? Any response and help will be highly appreciated.

    Best regards,

    Yu

  2. Andrew Young August 21, 2018   9:28 am

    Hi Yu,

    Thanks for reading the blog and for your comment!

    For questions related to your modeling, please contact our Support team:
    – Online Support Center: https://www.comsol.com/support
    – Email: support@comsol.com

    Best regards,
    Andrew

  3. Telma Tarcisio Abibo September 7, 2018   4:54 am

    Hi Andrew Young,
    Thank you for sharing with us, I am using the same example of pore scale model but doing the coupling with the heat transfer in porous media and solid mechanics, i need help in how to handle the 3 physics together, i can just couple 2……..any idea in how to do it,?

  4. Andrew Young September 11, 2018   6:50 am

    Hi Telma,

    My thanks to you also for your feedback! It is certainly possible to extend the concept of this blog to include heat transfer and fluid-structure interaction (i.e. Solid Mechanics in the matrix and fluid flow in the pore space). This will depend upon the detail with which you wish to model the interactions. For more information, please contact our Support team as mentioned in my previous comment.

    Thanks again,
    Andrew

Loading Comments...

Categories


Tags